<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deploying Flash P2P app on Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/</link>
	<description>Realtime Rich Internet Applications using Adobe technologies</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yoz</title>
		<link>http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-16253</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashrealtime.com/?p=861#comment-16253</guid>
		<description>pure p2p video conferences on http://apps.facebook.com/onconference/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pure p2p video conferences on <a href="http://apps.facebook.com/onconference/" rel="nofollow">http://apps.facebook.com/onconference/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davet</title>
		<link>http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-13008</link>
		<dc:creator>davet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashrealtime.com/?p=861#comment-13008</guid>
		<description>Hey guys , 
I was just starting on doing one of these.  I have a problem , can you help please.

When I get my netconnection.nearID (nc.nearID) and try and display it in aan Alert box like , Alert.show("This is " + nc.nearID); I dont get anything ( Alert.show("This is " ); works fine)? Is this normal , I can see nc.uri or nc.toString(). So what is going on ?

Any help greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys ,<br />
I was just starting on doing one of these.  I have a problem , can you help please.</p>
<p>When I get my netconnection.nearID (nc.nearID) and try and display it in aan Alert box like , Alert.show(&#8221;This is &#8221; + nc.nearID); I dont get anything ( Alert.show(&#8221;This is &#8221; ); works fine)? Is this normal , I can see nc.uri or nc.toString(). So what is going on ?</p>
<p>Any help greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: test</title>
		<link>http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-11426</link>
		<dc:creator>test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashrealtime.com/?p=861#comment-11426</guid>
		<description>test test comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test test comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-11202</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashrealtime.com/?p=861#comment-11202</guid>
		<description>I would rather wait till Flash Player 10.1 for Groups and Multicast stuff as it is going to be much clear and proper to do such things.

Btw: have a look at this article: http://blog.yoz.sk/2009/10/p2pmulticast/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rather wait till Flash Player 10.1 for Groups and Multicast stuff as it is going to be much clear and proper to do such things.</p>
<p>Btw: have a look at this article: <a href="http://blog.yoz.sk/2009/10/p2pmulticast/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.yoz.sk/2009/10/p2pmulticast/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pekka Kuismanen</title>
		<link>http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-11200</link>
		<dc:creator>Pekka Kuismanen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashrealtime.com/?p=861#comment-11200</guid>
		<description>Got it working now. However, when the third peer enters, it starts to lag really badly. I have 1 sendStream and 2 receiveStream instances in the case of 3 peers. There's only one client instance for the 2 receiveStreams. Could this be causing the lag? I'll try next if I can get it to work by having one client instance for every receiveStream and combine the data myself. Not sure why it should lag like that.

-PK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it working now. However, when the third peer enters, it starts to lag really badly. I have 1 sendStream and 2 receiveStream instances in the case of 3 peers. There&#8217;s only one client instance for the 2 receiveStreams. Could this be causing the lag? I&#8217;ll try next if I can get it to work by having one client instance for every receiveStream and combine the data myself. Not sure why it should lag like that.</p>
<p>-PK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-11189</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashrealtime.com/?p=861#comment-11189</guid>
		<description>Just stay tuned .)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just stay tuned .)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pekka Kuismanen</title>
		<link>http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-11177</link>
		<dc:creator>Pekka Kuismanen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashrealtime.com/?p=861#comment-11177</guid>
		<description>Yes for just sending to many peers one instance of sendStream seems to be enough. For both sending and receiving I can get 2 peers working, but when the third comes in it just becomes too hard to imagine how it goes haha. I'll try to instanciate every receiveStream into a separate instance, take the farIDs from DB and start it that way. Any info when is the 10.1 coming? haha Thanks again! Pekka</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes for just sending to many peers one instance of sendStream seems to be enough. For both sending and receiving I can get 2 peers working, but when the third comes in it just becomes too hard to imagine how it goes haha. I&#8217;ll try to instanciate every receiveStream into a separate instance, take the farIDs from DB and start it that way. Any info when is the 10.1 coming? haha Thanks again! Pekka</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-11165</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashrealtime.com/?p=861#comment-11165</guid>
		<description>I meant 3 instances for 3 streams 3 way communication</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant 3 instances for 3 streams 3 way communication</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-11164</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashrealtime.com/?p=861#comment-11164</guid>
		<description>Pekka, I think you have to create 3 instances for two-way communication. But there might be probably one instance enough just for sending and 3 receiving. I am not 100% sure about this. Just go ahead and try, but anyway - All these kind of multi-user things will be solved in Flash Player 10.1, where you have Groups and Multicast available - so it's going to be much easier to handle this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pekka, I think you have to create 3 instances for two-way communication. But there might be probably one instance enough just for sending and 3 receiving. I am not 100% sure about this. Just go ahead and try, but anyway - All these kind of multi-user things will be solved in Flash Player 10.1, where you have Groups and Multicast available - so it&#8217;s going to be much easier to handle this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pekka Kuismanen</title>
		<link>http://www.flashrealtime.com/deploy-flash-p2p-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-11146</link>
		<dc:creator>Pekka Kuismanen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashrealtime.com/?p=861#comment-11146</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I meant NetStream that's used for receiving when I wrote ReceiveStream. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant NetStream that&#8217;s used for receiving when I wrote ReceiveStream. <img src='http://www.flashrealtime.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
